What is worth that one stop that separates a cropped sensor from a full 35mm? Everything. The lenses make the Fuji a camera system. Now the third reason (the most important): the quality of the optics, in particular of 35mm.
#Mirrorless fuji full frame iso
The second: the classic raw comparison at high ISO: above ISO 1600 the Fuji fights almost on a par with the best Nikon and Canon full frames. The first: the comparison between the same shot taken with a X-Pro1 and a D800e. Finally, two reviews made me decide to buy. On the other hand, the lack of the anti-aliasing filter on the X-Trans sensor, is so positive that I cannot imagine myself to buy another camera with anti-aliasing filter. In certain genres such as landscape, having 5 more megapixels is always better, especially for those who, like me, print A3+ and does not shout wow! viewing a photo displayed on an iPhone. Moral: overflowing a garden with plants, not always makes it a good garden, and you’ve to work more and more to take care of it. But one thing is having a technological tool, another using a camera for doing photography. It was necessary, at least for the marketing departments, to step up in 24×36 format in order to compete with the old SLR. Today Sony has made “full frame” the buzz of the moment. The size of the sensor is the first factor that affects image quality: more light equals more details and information. It makes no sense to compare a full frame sensor with a mirrorless cropped one.
Canon, among reflex cameras, is the one that allows you to more easily adapt these lenses.
#Mirrorless fuji full frame manual
On this cameras I attacched a variety of manual lenses (contax, leica-r, m42 and so on). I hate wasting time.įor about two years I used Canon full frame (5d classic, then mark II), after started shooting digital with 400d and 40d, all purchased in gray market. As I’m not a loyal customers of any brand, so when I run into those stupid discussions “is Leica better than Zeiss?” or “Canon vs Nikon”, I’ll immediately stop reading.
One of the most important things in life, I believe, is intellectual honesty. Within that bright viewfinder I discovered the world of photography.Ī premise. I did the first shots of my life with this camera, I was a child. In truth, the cause was when I picked up my old Praktica BC1 of 1989 (a Zeiss clone produced in the former East Germany: really another age). A forum that I follow carefully is, in particular topics dedicated to images taken with a particular brand. The decision to try Fuji has been long and thoughtful, after reading numerous reviews on sites, blogs and magazines, having evaluated opinions of early adopters who have ventured with this brand. How the Fuji mirrorless cameras has become a photographic system 2.0. A review of the Fujifilm X-Pro after one year.
0 kommentar(er)
